Last Updated on

Inspire kids to become scientists by saying that…..…………………………………………

……………………………………..

An object can exist only if a

perfectly accurate mathematical description of the universe mathematically allows it to do so. Such a description resembles Tegmark’s mathematical universe.

……………………………………..

Mere existing might just be a duality(interchangeability) for a mathematical tool for making perfectly

accurate predictions, and vice versa. That’s why our existential reality consists of subjective yes-no questions.

……………………………………..

…………………………………………

According to Zurek’s *quantum Darwinism* , our concrete reality condenses(or gets transacted?) from the multiple competing options residing fundamentally in quantum realm ( or in subjectively inaccessible Tegmarkian objectivity/entity?).

…………………………………………

Quantum superposition doesn’t really mean that it is in several states at once; rather, it means that if we make a measurement we will see one of those outcomes. Our familiar existential reality is not objectively independent but transactional/medium-born/ subjective/in-transit/signal-processed.

…………………………………………

The notation used to denote some integers and the their relations in a certain equation is irrelevant; the only properties of integers are those embodied by the relations between them. Only ‘mathematical relations’ are truly baggage-free.

……………………………………..

Any external reality independent of humans is purely mathematical. It is no coincidence that mathematical abstractions need no linguistic baggages.

……………………………………..

Any external reality independent of humans is purely mathematical. It is no coincidence that mathematical equations strip things down to their nakedness.

…………………………………………

……………………………………..

An object can exist only if a

perfectly accurate mathematical description of the universe mathematically allows it to do so. Such a description resembles Tegmark’s mathematical universe.

……………………………………..

Mere existing might just be a duality(interchangeability) for a mathematical tool for making perfectly

accurate predictions, and vice versa. That’s why our existential reality consists of subjective yes-no questions.

……………………………………..

……………………………………..

According to Max Tegmark, a BEING is just a self-aware part of a giant mathematical object.

…………………………………………

…………………………………………

Max Tegmark dares to say that our reality consists of mathematics.

……………………………………..

Reality’s ultimate element might not be particles, fields or strings but numbers.

……………………………………..

According to Max Tegmark, our reality is literally a mathematical structure.

…………………………………………

Although a stone is made of quarks and electrons , we humans have invented the word ‘stone’ to save time while describing its behaviours. Such linguistic baggages like ‘quarks’, ‘molecules’, ‘rocks’, ‘stars’ and ‘people’ are actually nothing but intuitively convenient optionals. A really objective description of reality needs no such baggages.

Only mathematical structures can be defined in a purely abstract way, without any human baggage.

……………………………………..

According to Max Tegmark, our so-called physical world might actually be, beyond our wildest expectations, A GIANT MATHEMATICAL OBJECT.

…………………………………………

Mathematical patterns in nature

( embedded in various equations of motion, gravity, electricity, magnetism, light, heat, chemistry, radioactivity or subatomic particles) are summarized as the laws of physics.

……………………………………..

The number ‘3’ ( the dimensionality of our space) belongs to a mathematical realm.

…………………………………………

…………………………………………

Randomness, complexity and even change are just illusions if our universe is just an eternal mathematical structure.

……………………………………..

Max Tegmark’s mathematical universe is equivalent to the strong version of platonic reality.

……………………………………..

Along with his professional working on mainstream cosmology, Max Tegmark secretly kept himself engaged with his strange theory of mathematical universe.

…………………………………………